OBJETIVOS DE DESENVOLVIMENTO SUSTENTÁVEL (ODS) EM PROJETOS DE RESPONSABILIDADE SOCIAL DA INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTÍCIA DE CARNES E DERIVADOS

Lucivone Maria Peres de Castelo Branco Branco; Raquel da Silva Pereira Pereira; Paulo Mendes; Cicero Marcelo Bezerra dos Santos Santos

doi:10.13037/gr.vol39.e20238506

Authors

Lucivone Maria Peres de Castelo Branco Branco Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4330-4894
Raquel da Silva Pereira Pereira Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-080X
Paulo Mendes Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-2548
Cicero Marcelo Bezerra dos Santos Santos Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-9835

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol39.e20238506

Keywords:

Management for Development and Regionality. Corporate social responsibility. Stakeholders. ODS. Food industry

Abstract

This research addresses Corporate Social Responsibility in the Meat Industry by analyzing the reflexes of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the stakeholder demands in projects of a socio-environmental nature. It is, therefore, an exploratory research and with a qualitative approach. The four food industries that were classified in the Novo Mercado, by Bolsa Brasil Balcão (B3), the São Paulo stock exchange, were analyzed. Content analysis of the documentary stage was performed and, subsequently, also of the answers obtained from the participating managers. It can be concluded that there are several social responsibility actions of these industries in the observed period (2016 to 2020) related to the SDGs, with some of the stakeholders identified by them. Through this research it was possible to see that the SDGs are being partially considered by the companies studied and can be more emphasized, as well as the strengthening of the relationship with stakeholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lucivone Maria Peres de Castelo Branco Branco, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS

Doutora em Administração pela Universidade na Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS. Mestre em Sociedade, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente pelo Centro Universitário de Anápolis - UniEvangelica. Professora concursada no Centro Universitário de Goiatuba - UniCerrado, nos cursos de Administração e Ciências Contábeis.

Raquel da Silva Pereira Pereira, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS

Doutora em Ciências Sociais e Mestre em Administração, ambos pela PUC/SP. Especialista em Administração de Recursos Humanos, pela Escola Superior de Administração de Negócios - ESAN. Professora e pesquisadora do Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração (PPGA/USCS).

Paulo Mendes, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS

Mestre em Comunicação Social e Doutorando em Administração pela Universidade de Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS. Chefe de gabinete da reitoria da USCS.

Cicero Marcelo Bezerra dos Santos Santos, Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS

Mestre em Desenvolvimento Regional Sustentável, pela UFCA; Professor da Universidade Federal do Cariri (UFCA), nos cursos do Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas (Administração Pública, contábeis e Administração); Doutorando em Administração (USCS)

References

AKREMI, A. et al. How do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsability? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholders Responsability Scale. Journal of Management, v. 44, n. 2, p. 619-657, 2018. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0149206315569311?casa_token=AkV-XupLtxoAAAAA:b1_8TY97ZtdeP77cFbFMcdQGhfbI872_8iMFCBx2zsJhVV10jc5RXqMk3K433_Rz3RwYIwzXhkwf . Acesso em 23 abr. 2020.

BOESSO, G.; KUMAR, K.; MICHELON, G. Descriptive, instrumental and strategic approaches to corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 26, n. 3, p. 399-422, 2013. Disponível em: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/emeaaajpp/v_3a26_3ay_3a2013_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a399-422.htm . Acesso em: 22 mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571311311874

BOGDAN, R. S.; BIKEN, S. Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. 12. ed. Porto: Editora Porto, 2003.

BONNAFOUS-BOUCHER, M.; RENDTORFF, J. D. Stakeholder theory: A model for strategic management. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0

BUNDY, J.; SHROPSHIRE, C.; BUCHHOLTZ, A. Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, v. 38, n. 3, p. 352-376, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43700495 . Acesso em 06 abr. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0179

CARROLL, A. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, v. 4, n. 4, p. 497-505, 1979. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/257850?seq=1 . Acesso em 17 mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296

CARROLL, A. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, v. 34, n. 4, p. 39-48, 1991. Disponível em: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeebushor/v_3a34_3ay_3a1991_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a39-48.htm . Acesso em 17 mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

CLARKSON, M. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 1, p. 92-117, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994

CORRÊA, D. A. et al. Inovação, sustentabilidade e responsabilidade social: análise da experiência de uma empresa e equipamentos pesados. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, v. 4, n. 3, p. 90-105, 2010. Disponível em: https://rgsa.emnuvens.com.br/rgsa/article/view/330 . Acesso em 13 maio 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v4i3.330

DAVIS, K. The Case for and against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, v. 16, n. 2, p. 312-322, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/255331

DONALDSON, T.; PRESTON, L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 1, p. 65-91, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992

EISENHART, K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532-550, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

EISENHART, K. M.; GRAEBNER, M. Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. 25-32, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

ELKINGTON, J. Canibais com garfo e faca. São Paulo: M. Books do Brasil, 2012.

FASSIN, Y. A dynamic perspective in Freeman’s stakeholder model. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 96, n. 1, p. 39-49, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29789754 . Acesso em jun. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0942-6

FREEMAN, R, E. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984.

FREEMAN, R, E. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, v. 4, n. 2, p. 233-236, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893932

GARRIGA, E.; MELÉ, D. Corporate Social Responsability Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 5, n. 2, p. 51-71, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25123282 . Acesso em 25 mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34

GIL, A. C. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.

GODFREY, P. C.; HATCH, N. W. Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 70, n. 1, p. 87-98, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9080-y

HUSTED, B. W.; ALLEN, D. B. Toward a model of corporate social strategy formulation. In: Proceedings of the Social Issues in Management Division at Academy of Management Conference. Washington, United States of America, 2001.

HUSTED, B. W.; SALAZAR, J. J. Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, n. 1, p. 75-91, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x

IMB – INSTITUTO MAURO BORGES DE ESTATÍSTICA E ESTUDOS SOCIOECONÔMICOS. Goiás. 2020. Disponível em: http://imb.go.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=79&Itemid=145 .

JAMALI, D. A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 82, n. 1, p. 213-231, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9572-4

LANTOS, G. P. The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, v. 18, n. 7, p. 595-630, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410281

LOPES, M. M. C. A Importância dos Stakeholders na Responsabilidade Social Empresarial Estratégica. Tese (Doutorado em Marketing) – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. ISCTE – IUL, Departamento de Marketing, Operações e Gestão Geral. Lisboa, 2015. Disponível em: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/10038/1/Tese_Out_2015_Final_Juri.pdf . Acesso em 18 fev. 2019.

MAON, F.; LINDGREEN, A.; SWAEN, V. Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 12, n. 1, p. 20-38, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00278.x

MILES, M. B.; HUBERMAN, A. M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. California; SAGE publications Inc. London, 1984.

MITCHELL, R. K.; AGLE, B. R.; WOOD, D. J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, v. 43, n. 4, p. 853-886, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

ONU – ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolução adotada na Assembleia Geral de 25 de setembro de 2015. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf . Acesso em 14 fev. 2019.

PARMAR, B.; FREEMAN, R. E.; HARRISON, J. W. A.; PURNELLL, L.; COLLE, S. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Nova York: Cambridge University Press. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768

PEREIRA, R. S. Desenvolvimento sustentável como responsabilidade social das empresas: um enfoque ambiental. São Paulo: Lorosae, 2002.

PORTER, M. E.; KRAMER, M. R. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, v. 84, n. 12, p. 78-92, 2006. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society-the-link-between-competitive-advantage-and-corporate-social-responsibility . Acesso em: 29 jan. 2020.

PORTER, M. E.; KRAMER, M. R. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, v. 89, n. 2, p. 62-77, 2011.Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value . Acesso em: 29 jan. 2020.

POST, J.; PRESTON, L.; SACHS, S. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, v. 45, n. 1, p. 6-28, 2002. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/41166151?casa_token=k390wU02gggAAAAA:LdYg-aMTsT4sXpUNUVqS6Au0d7l98B390xlR926M5Rwd9HaNvBjW_Gmbzqt0BtjdSsRg205X5-12 .

SCHWARTZ, M. S.; CARROLL, A. B. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 13, n. 4, p. 503-530, 2003. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3857969 . Acesso em 16 abr. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313435

SILVA, P. M. M.; CASTRO, A. B. C.; ROCHA, H. K. L. F.; EL-AOUAR, W. A. E.; CÂMARA JÚNIOR, S. L. Responsabilidade ambiental corporativa: um panorama das publicações internacionais para a identificação de temáticas emergentes. Gestão & Regionalidade, v. 36, n. 109, p. 176-194, 2020. Disponível em: https://seer.uscs.edu.br/index.php/revista_gestao/article/view/5820 . Acesso em 13 abr. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol36n109.5820

WEBER, J.; MARLEY, K. A. In search of stakeholder salience: exploring corporate social and sustainability reports. Business & Society, v. 51, n. 4, p. 626- 649, 2012. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0007650309353061?casa_token=gCqPY7_PewUAAAAA:jpKPp5AwiP1HrVOfh-wBt-t9rYPa9tDqNK0dE_OZBqzsFVjIdHVQtFWwrV3kufpwlAxCKWVpL0Hb . Acesso em 08 jun. 2020.

WOOD, D. J. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, v. 6, n. 4, p. 691-718, 1991. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/258977?seq=1 . Acesso em 11 fev. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279616